![]() ![]() IMO it seems reasonably evident that Darktable attempts to be a FOSS alternative to Lightroom at least as much as, and probably more than, it attempts to be either a uniquely-envisioned package or an alternative to any specific software other than Lightroom.Īnd Apple's Aperture first shipped in November 2005 if you really think there was nothing else on the market like Lightroom at the time that the Darktable developers could have taken inspiration from. You will have to bite the bullet and get the real thing: darktable. If what you want is a darktable clone then you will be disappointed. I have seen many people become discouraged when they pull out their hair trying to learn Lightroom and discover it is not just a darktable clone. Whether one prefers one program or the other is at this point probably more a question of taste and preference than capability-and that's probably true for most tools, really. ![]() Merely that darktable's modern scene-referred/color-adaptation tools work better than its older, more Lightroom-like ones were. They are actively discouraged, and deprecated and hidden (but still available for backwards-compatibility reasons).īy the way, I am not trying to claim that modern darktable's way is superior to Lightroom. If you look for Lightroom-style controls, you will find them, but they won't be great. That's why there are these comments that emphasize that darktable is not a Lightroom clone. The new "scene-referred" controls work much better than those old "display-referred" controls, and quite different from Lightroom's template. But that's not how modern darktable is intended to be used. The thing is, that due to backwards compatibility, there still is a "shadows" and "highlights" slider that works similarly to the one in Lightroom. However, it has since evolved in a very different direction, to the point where trying to replicate Lightroom's workflow in darktable now will leave new users frustrated. It's not about prior art, but divergent workflows.ĭarktable started out relatively similar to Lightroom. Perhaps the point has not been made clearly then. It's clear that in more than a few respects, the Darktable development team has decided to go their own way-arguably sometimes for good, sometimes for folly, and sometimes just for differences in taste. IMO it seems reasonably evident that Darktable attempts to be a FOSS alternative to Lightroom at least as much as, and probably more than, it attempts to be either a uniquely-envisioned package or an alternative to any specific software other than Lightroom. But Adobe first shipped Lightroom on Februthe first public release of Darktable was in April 2009. I'm happy that Darktable exists, and happy for those who like it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |